![]() ![]() Richard Austin FreemanA Classic Writer of 'Golden Age of Detection' English Mysteries'Thorndyke is a unique figure in the legal world. He is a barrister and a doctor of medicine. In the one capacity he is probably the greatest criminal lawyer of our time. In the other he is, among other things, the leading authority of poisons and on crimes connected with them; and so far as I know, he has never made a mistake.'-- As a Thief in the Night
'We mustn't expect too much, Jervis,' said he; 'in fact we have no reason to expect anything. We are just looking over this jetsam as a matter of routine to note any facts that it may seem to suggest, without regard to their apparent relevancy or irrelevancy to our inquiry. You cannot judge the relevancy of an isolated fact. Experience has taught me, and must have taught you, that the most trivial, commonplace and seemingly irrelevant facts have a way of suddenly assuming a crucial importance by connecting, explaining or filling in the detail of later discoveries.' R. Austin Freeman (1862-1943) started his career as a Colonial Office doctor in West Africa, but was invalidated out having contracted blackwater fever (luckily not Ebola, otherwise we should never have had 40 years' worth of Dr John Evelyn Thorndyke novels!). Freeman's influence in the detective novel sphere was powerful beyond expectation, although it took many years for his reputation to develop. Thorndyke, while not the prototype (Holmes had his cigarette ashes, although in a very perfunctory way compared with JT), was the first 'real' scientific detective, combining vast knowledge of forensic medicine and examination of minutia (i.e., rat hairs, dust particles, etc.) with great erudition and dignity. These books were dry in style, fascinating in detail, and all pretty much according to a formula -- a young lawyer or doctor or other colleague (such as the Watsonian Jervis and Anstey) gets involved in some mysterious circumstances, calls on his old tutor JT, who hears out the tale with great urbanity and politeness, over port and cigars, and spots some hidden element about which he is 'close as an oyster', involves his ingenious assistant the 'crinkly faced' Polton in devising a scientific investigation, then makes all clear at the end, usually in a dramatic courtroom testimony. Dry as these stories sound, they are still fascinatingly readable, especially when delving into some obscure topic such as pond fauna, archeological anthropology, Egyptology, what have you. The characters are all convincing, often sympathetic even when they are villains, with at least one Dickensian eccentric in each book, although there is very little dramatic action apart from the mystification, the unravelling of the investigation, and an occasional surprise climax. Once one gets used to Freeman, it is usually easy to figure out who the culprit is, although not how he will be caught; in fact RAF pioneered the so-called 'inverted' detective story, where part one of the narrative describes the commission of the crime, including the identity of the felon, and part two is Thorndyke's investigation. This method of detective story exposition has been used effectively in many novels and short stories (Vickers, Berkeley, etc.), although it is not especially what one wants in a mystery novel.
![]() Freeman's prose style was dry and precise, but also witty and pleasant. It may seem rather stilted to modern readers, but is prefectly suited to his themes. He also tended to repeat his formulas, usually including a somewhat mawkish romance without any real sexual elements; if there was an inquest, there was always a curmudgeon on the jury who drove the coroner crazy with irrelevant questions, if a trial, a reptilian judge with a mean wit. Some themes and settings are actually reproduced with only minor changes. This does not harm the stories (unless you read several uninterruptedly) but actually adds to their appeal given one's expectations as to a typical Thorndyke. Many readers complain that Thorndyke's encylopedic knowledge in all areas ranging from biology to archeology does not 'play fair' because the information is not known generally and hence does not lend itself to deduction on the reader's part. It doesn't bother fans, since they know something is afoot when Thorndyke clams up and goes up to the lab to potter with Polton, and it doesn't harm the plot that one has no idea what the actual esoterica are since that is rather irrelevant as long as one knows it is a clue. Here are quick summaries of all his books (that I know of; the best, as my opinion goes, are starred):
![]() Grobius Top 50 Mystery List | Home PageFastCounter by bCentral |
Note: Julian Symons is very cruel to Freeman in his history of the detective story, Mortal Consequences: "[His] talents as a writer were negligible. Reading a Freeman story is very much like chewing dry straw." This is both prejudiced and unfair, as RAF is regarded by many as one of the best of the classic mystery novelists. On that side, Raymond Chandler, of all people, praised him highly, especially 'those wonderful walks across London'. Dr Thorndyke's expertise (amongst all his other interests) in the matter of the jeweller/goldsmith's art, Lemel and Floorsweep ("The New Jersey Sphinx"), inspired a Grobius web page, which really has nothing to do with detective stories, about Jargon Recycling. When one wants pure escapism from the tribulations of the 21st Century, a Freeman novel (or a Doyle or Fleming, depending on one's mood) is a fine choice.
Please note the following web page, which is an ancillary to this one. For a full text of Freeman's introduction to "The Art of Detection" go to this link, which was supplied by Jon Jermey of the GAD newsgroup.
It should also be noted that like his contemporary, Arthur Machen, and others, Freeman had an in-depth knowledge of the back streets, alleys, and snickleways of London before WWII, especially around Fleet Street, also of areas like Highgate and Hampstead (although much more damage has been done all over England by more recent property developers and city planners in the last forty years than was done by the Luftwaffe). For those who love 'old' London, this is one of the major charms of the books.
Another point to be stressed is that Freeman is very repetitive not just in his settings, dialogue, and Thorndykean catch-phrases, but in his character types, including his regulars like Brodribb and Jervis and Polton. Young doctor/lawyer narrator (usually a locum just out of school who had been a pupil of Thorndyke's), a sexless romance that usually involves the heroine in some danger, a coroner's inquest that often has a wise-ass juryman who asks 'improper' questions, some esoteric subject ranging from pond formanifera and the properties of Kentish loam to pottery and clock-making, experiments involving the use of plaster casts and the like, etc. In most cases the villain dies before coming to trial -- suicide, shot while escaping, and so on -- disappointing to Supt. Miller. This was a common thing in Golden Age of Detection days, 'all for the best' expressed on the grounds of 'sparing' the survivors but actually, I suspect, a disapproval of the death penalty. All very predictable in any case, so it doesn't do for a reader to go through a bunch of Freemans in a row: Interperse some Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett.
Story collections by Clifford Ashdown (written with J.J. Pitcairn)
1. The Adventures of Romney Pringle (1902; 6 stories)
2. The Further Adventures of Romney Pringle (1969; 6 stories)
3. From a Surgeon's Diary (1975; 6 stories)
...............................................................................................................